The EU Pay Transparency Directive is changing the way companies think about and communicate remuneration. This guide shows organisations how to prepare their HR structures, data and narratives in five clear steps.
In this article:
The EU Pay Transparency Directive wasn’t written to be checked off. It was designed to expose the hidden structure of how companies assign value. It was created to reinforce a principle long enshrined in law but rarely enforced with clarity: equal pay for equal work. The directive requires companies to show—not just promise—that they pay in accordance with this principle. It asks them to look at and disclose the result of their compensation and pay decisions. And it turns abstract commitments into measurable data, structured reports and traceable comparisons.
On paper, the directive is straightforward: no more salary history questions, mandatory transparency in hiring, recurring gender pay gap reports, and tangible consequences for unjustified disparities. But putting this into practice reveals a deeper challenge. The question is whether your internal setup, from payroll feeds to job design, can make sense of what’s coming into the light. That means consolidating HR data, building standardised processes, and enabling dynamic collaboration between HR, IT and Legal. Without this foundation, achieving compliance could prove challenging.
That’s why engaging both CHROs and CIOs is key to success. CIOs can ensure that technical systems do more than store data, but also help surface insights, detect patterns, and support decisions that hold up under scrutiny. CHROs can consider the implications across talent acquisition, compensation and workforce planning. Technology choices are shaping these areas from the inside out. Talent, compensation, workforce planning: each of them runs on systems that need to be designed with intent.
To stay ahead, these roles need to work more closely than ever. Recruiting, retention, and reward systems are changing—and HR must help shape them, or risk being shaped by them.
And urgency is growing. Even companies not immediately obligated to report upon transposition will face questions—from applicants, employees, and investors. And that includes companies headquartered outside the EU with operations or hiring activity in member states. If they can’t explain their pay structures, someone else will. Transparency is no longer optional. It’s a strategic necessity and technology is the lever.
This article outlines five practical steps companies can take now to prepare for the transposition of the directive into national law and its application. It’s not about abstract theory or one-size-fits-all checklists. It’s about making smart, foundational moves now before the scrutiny starts. Yes, pay transparency is a policy update. But it’s also a shift in how value is measured, rewarded and communicated. Companies that act early don’t just increase their chances of being compliant, they’ll lead with credibility.
Preparation starts with a simple but pressing question: Can you explain how work is defined, evaluated and compensated across your organisation? Those who can’t answer this will likely struggle to meet the directive’s requirements. Pay transparency is not only about publishing tables. Building a structure that makes comparisons possible is key to assess the value of work: What responsibilities come with which roles? What skills are required? What differentiates job levels?
Data alone won’t provide these answers. A structured framework is needed to make complexity legible. A robust job architecture, with consistent criteria for evaluating roles and salaries, is essential. But even that isn’t enough. Only when data from payroll, benefits, HR systems and compensation policies is connected does a full picture emerge.
At the core of this is worker categorisation. You’ll read more about that in step two. But equally important is owning the narrative. The question is no longer if you communicate about pay, but how. Proactive explanation takes control away from comparison websites and external commentators. Because once the data is public, it tells a story. Whether that story builds trust depends on how well it was prepared.
And transparency doesn’t end with base salary. The Directive’s definition of “pay” includes complementary and variable pay components: bonuses, allowances, benefits and pensions are listed as examples. This calls not just for technical reporting, but for strategic clarity: What is paid, why—and can this logic be understood?
What you can do: Use a platform that consolidates all salary components and links them to consistent criteria. This not only supports reporting. It creates a structure that’s explainable, internally and externally.
A core requirement of the directive is clear worker categorisation. Companies will be required to group roles of equal value based on objective criteria including responsibilities, skills, effort and working conditions—not just job titles or departments. Without this, pay gap reporting risks being flawed or even misleading.
This begins with a grading structure that applies objective evaluation criteria, typically through point factor methods. These allow roles to be classified consistently across regions, hierarchies and job families. While the directive doesn’t dictate the method, it demands that companies be able to explain it.
In practice, this means reviewing job architecture: Are levels applied systematically? Do they support comparison across units and geographical areas? Do they reflect actual working conditions or responsibilities? And are they integrated with payroll and HR data so that reporting can be automated?
Those who focus on flexibility today will experience fewer surprises tomorrow.
A grading system reviewed and agreed not just by HR but by other stakeholders such as Legal, Compliance and Workers Representatives (where applicable), provides internal consistency and is the foundation for defensible reporting. When pay gaps appear, companies can show that their groupings were objective, accurate and transparent.
What you can do: Assess your job evaluation system. Identify overlaps or gaps. Then launch a cross-functional project—HR-led but legally and technically supported—to build a grading framework that’s explainable, traceable and audit-ready.
The directive requires companies to account for total employee pay - not just base salary, but other considerations received in respect of their employment such as bonuses, allowances, overtime, pensions, training compensation, sick pay and non-cash reward. To do this well, it is beneficial to model these elements across geographies and job categories, and adapt them over time.
Rigid compensation systems can’t meet this challenge. Companies need to segment, group and simulate various scenarios to help them understand how each element contributes to overall pay, and where distortions may occur. A flexible model enables not just reporting, but insight: How do benefits compare across worker groups? Where do outliers occur? What signals reveal unintentional bias?
What you can do: Use Workday to consolidate and report on your compensation data across multiple dimensions. Integrate salary, bonus, benefits and other components to reveal areas that require cross departmental focus. Ensure your data infrastructure is flexible enough to handle the inevitable changes required as interpretation of local law progresses. Flexibility today means fewer surprises tomorrow.
Pay ranges or pay levels will become public—through employee rights to pay information and possibly, job postings. Companies should prepare not only to disclose, but to defend them. Without internal alignment, discrepancies will surface—and fast.
The pressure point is not the external demand for transparency. It’s whether your internal logic holds up to scrutiny. Can you explain why two roles of equal value earn differently? Are differences tied to performance, location or role design—or do they reveal inconsistencies?
Proactive preparation means reviewing ranges before they go live. Can you simulate comparisons across business units? Spot when bonuses distort base salary logic? Resolve unclear performance criteria? Doing this in advance allows you to avoid defensive fixes later.
What you can do: Run a pay transparency audit with your legal team and under legal privilege, that reviews both pay range structure and internal coherence. Make sure your narratives—on performance, market benchmarks and bonus logic—are documented and ready to communicate. Equip managers with the confidence to explain pay structures clearly.
Roles evolve, geographies expand, and compliance thresholds vary. A streamlined but customisable architecture allows for reliable reporting and aligned strategy.
Many companies still operate with outdated frameworks—duplicated profiles, inconsistent grading, legacy roles. The directive puts pressure on these systems. If you can’t map jobs clearly and compare them meaningfully, pay reporting becomes guesswork.
The goal is to clean up, consolidate and systematise what exists. Modern tools like Workday can help to flag duplicates, suggest job matches and improve role descriptions. What matters is a framework that adapts without losing consistency.
What you can do: The directive states that Working Conditions, Skills, Effort and Responsibility are four dimensions that must be considered in worker categorisation (other relevant factors can apply, where appropriate). Does your current job architecture reflect these elements? Do you have roles that are unclear or inconsistent? Can you maintain and scale the architecture across new business needs? A well-structured job architecture isn’t just a tool for reporting. It’s the foundation for fair, explainable pay decisions.
Conclusion: Those who start now will shape the outcome. The EU Pay Transparency Directive isn’t just about compliance. It’s about making value and equity visible. Companies that prepare early—by building structure, creating relevant data assets and aligning narratives—will be better positioned to meet their obligations and build trust, once the Directive is transposed into national law and applicable. Because in a world where pay becomes public, preparation shapes perception. And perception, more than ever, is business-critical.
Let's review where you stand and how Workday can best support you on your journey to EU pay transparency. Get in touch with us.
The EU Directive on pay transparency calls for honesty in salaries – and is becoming a strategic lever for fairness, trust and competitiveness.
More Reading
More than ever, finance leaders must possess a broader skill set, including the ability to analyze complex data, identify trends, and provide insights that inform critical business decisions and create value.
Empowering our global customers to thrive has always been at Workday’s core and in today's dynamic geopolitical and AI regulatory landscape, particularly in the European Union, we are focused on providing customers with the tools and assurances they need to confidently adapt to today’s uncertainty.
Financial consolidation and close is more than a reporting cycle—it’s a test of how connected, agile, and future-ready finance really is. Modernizing the process is the key to moving faster with confidence.