Josh Bersin's model of the agile organisation provides the appropriate framework: jobs are broken down into roles, roles are based on skills – and these can be supplemented or taken over by agents. While task-based agents automate individual tasks, role-based agents take on more complex roles with a clear goal in mind. They are more than tools. They are co-players.
An example: the recruitment agent. They screen applicant data, prioritise candidates, communicate with managers and initiate succession processes. All of this is done proactively, scalably and, crucially, integrated into existing systems. The individual process becomes a system process. People remain in the lead. But they no longer use tools – they work in tandem with a digital colleague.
Governance instead of control: Why HR is now in demand
The more tasks agents take on, the more urgent the question becomes: Who is responsible? When machines act, new principles for organisation, ethics and security are needed. HR plays a central role in this.
Agents must be introduced like new employees: they need access, roles and clear frameworks. They must be located – in the structure, in the process, in the responsibility. Workday is developing an ‘Agent System of Record’ for this purpose – a kind of operating system for digital workforces. It brings order, structure and governance to a system that would otherwise be almost impossible to control.
The principle behind it: trust through transparency. Agents should not just function. They must be explainable, traceable and controllable. This is the only way to create the basis for acceptance – and thus for effectiveness.
Every technological revolution begins with a crisis of trust. AI is no exception. Anyone who delegates decisions to systems wants to know how they are made. What has been trained? What data is used? Where are the biases? And who retains control?
Workday is committed to maximum transparency: with AI fact sheets for every function, granular control over data usage, and human final decision-making on critical issues. The systems deliver – but humans make the decisions. Always.
But trust alone is not enough. It needs to be applied. And that's where the real challenge begins.
The real challenge: adoption
Technology alone does not transform anything. It is the people who use it – or choose not to. This is exactly where the AI Business School comes in. Its diagnosis: technological development is racing ahead, but many workforces are putting the brakes on. The result: the ‘AI adoption gap’.
This gap can only be closed if two things happen simultaneously: technological introduction and targeted empowerment. Success factor: critical mass. When 15 to 20 percent of the workforce is truly AI-competent, a dynamic emerges that multiplies on its own. Three things are crucial: Training must be role-based, because an accountant needs different tools than a marketer. It must be personalised, depending on prior experience, position and learning curve.